3 rue Geoffroy-Marie
75009 Paris

Tax Audits of Individuals: The Steps in Detail

4 May 2020 | Individual Tax Audits

The ESFP: the steps in detail

A procedure used in the tax audit of an individual, the in-depth review of the personal tax situation (examen de la situation fiscale personnelle, ESFP) aims to verify the consistency between the returns filed and reality. Documents and information may have to be provided throughout the procedure. As it follows several stages, it is worth understanding how the tax authorities operate.

Sending of an audit notice

The procedure begins with this notification being sent to the taxpayer concerned. Sent by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt, it states that an inspector is going to examine the financial and personal situation of the person receiving the notice.

The ESFP covers all members of the tax household. Even if the notice is sent to one particular person, everyone who is part of their household will be concerned.

The notice must mention the possibility of being assisted by an adviser. The Charter of the audited taxpayer (charte du contribuable vérifié) is enclosed with the letter to inform the taxpayer of their rights and obligations.

In this letter, the tax authorities state that the taxpayer has 60 days to provide all their bank account statements, as well as those of accounts used for transactions other than everyday ones. Financial accounts of all kinds and current accounts will be closely scrutinised.

Analysis of supporting documents

Once all the documents required for the review of the personal and financial situation have been gathered, the analysis phase can begin. Movements on the various financial accounts will be among the items examined. Current accounts, but also those held with brokerage institutions, a business’s accounting entries or notarial deeds, will make it possible to check whether the returns match the information found.

Mixed accounts will also be of interest to the tax officer. As they are used for both personal and business purposes, errors may occur. It is therefore important to check that the distinction between the business and the private account is properly maintained.

Foreign accounts also receive the auditor’s full attention. These accounts must indeed be declared. Where this is not the case, a tax reassessment will often follow.

The oral and adversarial discussion

Once the documents have been examined, the tax officer will point out the errors and omissions identified. The discrepancy between lifestyle and the returns filed may also be raised.

For their part, the taxpayer may be assisted by an adviser in order to deal with these issues. Useful both for their tax expertise and for their strategic skills in managing the relationship with the tax officer, the adviser can help find the right arguments to put forward during this discussion.

The review of financial movements reveals no error

In this situation, the oral and adversarial discussion is very simple. The consistency between the returns and the findings will simply be noted. The tax audit therefore ends, since the procedure has led to no findings. A notice of no adjustment will be sent.

Questions remain

Where sums have no logical explanation or the taxpayer refuses to cooperate, a new procedure will be triggered. The lack of concrete justifications will indeed lead to an even more serious process.

The written procedure

In the absence of valid arguments, the representative of the tax authorities will send a request for justification no. 2172-SD covering the years concerned by the ESFP. The taxpayer has 2 months to respond to this request. This period should be used to justify the nature and origin of the sums being questioned. This written procedure can generally only take place if the sums amount to twice the declared income or exceed it by at least €150,000.

If the first response to this request for justification is not satisfactory, the officer in charge of the file may send a second one, indicating the grey areas that remain. For this new request, the taxpayer has 30 days to provide additional supporting documents.

At the end of this period, the auditor will make an adjustment of the tax, taking into account all unjustified sums. An official proposed adjustment is sent to the taxpayer, referring to income of undetermined origin (revenus d’origine indéterminée). A new tax base is calculated and the tax will therefore be calculated on this new amount. This procedure generally results in sums to be paid.

Possible remedies

Following the proposed adjustment (proposition de rectification), the taxpayer may respond, making a final attempt to justify the sums concerned or to put forward convincing arguments. The adviser’s help will be very important at this stage.

This response will be carefully examined by the tax officer. Their role is to indicate whether the evidence provided makes it possible to amend the proposed adjustment or to cancel it. If not, it remains valid. In all cases, a response to the taxpayer’s observations is mandatory. It will set out the tax authorities’ decision following this response.

A hierarchical appeal to the superior may be made, as indicated in the taxpayer’s charter. The departmental contact person (interlocuteur départemental) may also be contacted to request a fresh review of the file.

The last possible remedy is referral to the Departmental Commission for Taxes and Turnover Taxes (commission départementale des impôts et taxes sur le chiffre d’affaires). In order to take this last step, the request must be made within 30 days of receiving the tax authorities’ response to the taxpayer’s observations. Otherwise, the referral may be refused.

This commission is able to assess the supporting documents presented to the officer in charge of the ESFP. It may also receive new evidence that may have an influence in this appeal. The analysis of all the documents in the file will enable an objective decision to be made.

At the end of this review, the departmental commission will issue an opinion. This opinion is purely advisory: it binds neither the tax authorities nor the taxpayer, but it has an impact on the burden of proof in the event of subsequent litigation. This last stage therefore makes it possible to conclude the ESFP procedure. A final notice will be sent to the taxpayer reminding them of the sums that will be placed in collection.

If the taxpayer wishes to contest the placing in collection (mise en recouvrement), they must file a claim, possibly accompanied by a request for a stay of payment.

Our tax law firm can assist you.

French Inbound Expatriate Tax Regime: How Does It Work?

1. Purpose and general rationale of the inbound expatriate regime The “inbound expatriates” (impatriés) regime under Article 155 B of the French General Tax Code (Code général des impôts, CGI) is an income tax exemption scheme designed to encourage employees and...

Crypto-assets and taxation in France: what the Cour des comptes really says — and why you should prepare 📊

With the publication in December 2023 of a report on crypto‑assets, the French Court of Audit (Cour des comptes) is sounding the alarm ⚠️: the rapid growth of the crypto market, combined with regulatory and tax frameworks deemed insufficient, is creating a major...

Cryptocurrencies and tax: why audits are set to surge with DAC 8 and the Travel Rule

The taxation of cryptocurrencies is changing profoundly, and individuals who hold or trade digital assets need to understand that anonymity is gradually disappearing. Two major frameworks, DAC 8 and the Travel Rule, are going to transform the way your transactions are...

Crypto Taxation: Why You Must Declare Your Capital Gains Before the Avalanche of Tax Audits (DAC8 & Travel Rule)

2025–2027 Guide – Understanding the risks and anticipating the arrival of the new European rules Introduction: the end of crypto opacity is approaching For a long time, crypto-assets enjoyed an image of anonymity and complete freedom. Many individual investors...

Request to Regularise an Undeclared Foreign Account: What to Do and What to Expect

1) General obligations and scope of the “declaration of accounts held abroad” Persons domiciled in France must declare accounts “opened, held, used or closed” abroad; the obligation covers not only account holders but also those who have used the account (even under a...

Exceptional contribution on high incomes (CEHR) – calculation on a “smoothed” base (quotient mechanism) with numerical examples

The exceptional contribution on high incomes (contribution exceptionnelle sur les hauts revenus, CEHR) is an additional contribution to income tax, assessed on the household's reference taxable income (revenu fiscal de référence, RFR), at rates of 3% and 4% above...

Differential Contribution on High Incomes (CDHR): Impact on Cryptocurrencies

Overview and purpose The differential contribution on high incomes (contribution différentielle sur les hauts revenus, CDHR) aims to ensure, in respect of 2025 income, a minimum taxation of 20% for the wealthiest taxpayers, in addition to income tax and the...

Taxation of RSUs (Restricted Stock Units) under French Law: Complete Guide

Quick summary: RSUs give rise to an acquisition gain and a capital gain on sale, with specific tax rules in France. French tax residents are subject to different tax regimes depending on the date on which the RSU plans were authorised. Withholding tax applies to...

Taxation of RSUs, Stock Options and Free Share Awards: What You Need to Know

1) RSUs = free share awards In practice, "RSUs" correspond under French law to "free share awards" (attributions gratuites d'actions) 2) Free share awards (RSUs) 2.1 Income tax For RSUs (free shares) authorised by an extraordinary general meeting (assemblée générale...

Failure to Declare a Revolut, N26, eToro, Wise or Degiro Account

It is perfectly legal to open accounts abroad, in particular through online applications such as Revolut, N26, eToro, Wise or Degiro. However, they must be declared every year to the tax authorities (administration fiscale) using form 3916 - 3916 bis. Box 8UU of...

myPOS and the French Tax Authorities

Most financial institutions (traditional banks, online banks, life insurance companies, trading platforms, savings institutions, private pension providers, etc.) in...

read more

DAC 8: The Nuclear Tax Bomb on Crypto

The European Union is preparing the nuclear tax bomb on crypto: DAC 8. According to some estimates, the tax shortfall on crypto amounts to hundreds of millions, or even...

read more