3 rue Geoffroy-Marie 75009 Parismuzan@uzan-avocat.fr01 83 64 34 03

The Automatic Exchange of Bank Account Information (CRS)

By Maître Marc Uzan | · updated | Foreign Accounts

The Automatic Exchange of Bank Account Information (CRS)

Since 2017, the French tax authorities have received every year, from many countries, information on the financial accounts that French residents hold abroad. This is the automatic exchange of information, organised by an international standard developed under the aegis of the OECD: the Common Reporting Standard, or CRS.

This article explains in plain terms how this exchange works, what information the French tax authorities receive and what it means for a French resident who holds an account abroad. Every situation remains specific: in case of doubt, a lawyer’s analysis helps determine the most appropriate steps.

In brief

  • Financial institutions in more than 110 jurisdictions identify every year the accounts of their customers resident in other States and send the information to their tax authorities, which pass it on to those of the State of residence.
  • For a French resident, this information in principle reaches the French tax authorities: the account holder’s identity, the account number, the balance or value at the end of the year, income and sale proceeds.
  • For accounts of individuals, the standard in principle provides for no threshold: a small account may also be reported.
  • The tax authorities compare this information with the declarations of accounts (form 3916-3916-bis) and with the income declared; a discrepancy may lead to a request for information or a pre-ticked box 8UU.
  • An undeclared account exposes the holder to fines and to an extended reassessment period and, depending on the case, to surcharges or even criminal prosecution: a lawyer’s analysis helps identify suitable solutions.

What is the automatic exchange of information?

The automatic exchange of financial information (AEOI) developed after the 2008 financial crisis, as part of the fight against tax fraud and tax evasion. In 2014, the OECD adopted the Common Reporting Standard, which lays down common rules: which institutions report, which accounts, what information and on what timetable.

Within the European Union, this standard was transposed by Directive 2014/107/EU, known as “DAC 2”. France was among the first States to apply it: the first exchanges took place in 2017, for accounts held in 2016. Other jurisdictions followed from 2018, such as Switzerland. More than 110 jurisdictions now exchange information under this standard, including all European Union Member States, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Monaco, Andorra, Singapore, Hong Kong and the United Arab Emirates; see the list of countries whose banks report to the French tax authorities.

The United States does not apply the Common Reporting Standard. France nevertheless receives certain information on the accounts its residents hold in the United States, under the intergovernmental agreement concluded with that country in 2013; this reciprocity is more limited, in particular because account balances are not transmitted.

The main stages

YearStage
2014Adoption of the Common Reporting Standard by the OECD and of the European “DAC 2” directive
2016Collection of the first information by the financial institutions of the first participating countries, including France
2017First exchanges between these countries, for the year 2016
2018First exchanges for other jurisdictions, including Switzerland
2026Application of the European “DAC 8” directive, which extends the exchange to crypto-assets
2027First exchanges planned on crypto-assets, for the year 2026

How does the exchange work?

The mechanism takes place in three stages, often summed up as “collect, report, exchange”:

  • financial institutions (banks, brokers, certain insurance companies, etc.) identify the tax residence of their customers, in principle by means of a self-certification provided when the account is opened, which states the State of residence and the tax identification number;
  • every year, they send to the tax authorities of their State the information on the accounts of customers resident in other participating States;
  • those authorities then pass this information on to the tax authorities of the account holder’s State of residence, in principle before the end of September of the following year.

Accounts held indirectly, for example through a company or a structure that carries on no real activity, may also be reported, in the name of the individuals who control it.

What information is transmitted?

For each account concerned, the information transmitted in principle includes:

CategoryExamples of information
Identity of the holderName, address, State of residence, tax identification number, date and place of birth
Identification of the accountAccount number, name and identifier of the financial institution
AmountBalance or value of the account at 31 December, or the fact that it was closed during the year
IncomeGross amounts of interest, dividends and other income paid into the account, gross proceeds from the sale of securities

For accounts of individuals, the standard in principle provides for no threshold: an account with a modest balance may therefore be reported. A threshold of 250,000 US dollars may, depending on the State, apply to certain company accounts opened before the standard came into force.

What do the French tax authorities do with this information?

The French tax authorities compare the information received with taxpayers’ returns: declarations of accounts abroad (form no. 3916-3916-bis) and income declared (form no. 2047 and return no. 2042). This information is also used in tax audits (see the article can the French tax authorities see your foreign bank accounts?).

When a reported account does not appear in the returns, the tax authorities may in particular pre-tick box 8UU of the income tax return (see the article on the pre-ticked box 8UU) or send the taxpayer a request for information (letter no. 751-SD). Depending on the case, they may also ask the taxpayer to justify the origin and terms of acquisition of the assets (Article L23 C of the French Tax Procedure Code): see the article on the request to regularise an undeclared foreign account.

An example

Paul, a French tax resident, has held an account with a Luxembourg bank for several years. At 31 December 2025, the balance is €3,000,000 and the account produced €75,000 of interest during the year. In 2026, the bank sends this information to the tax authorities of its country, which pass it on to the French tax authorities, in principle by the end of September 2026 at the latest. The French tax authorities can then check whether the account appears on a form 3916-3916-bis attached to the income tax return filed in the spring of 2026, and whether the €75,000 of interest was declared.

What are the consequences for an undeclared account?

Holding an account abroad is legal, but a French resident is in principle required to declare it every year and to declare its income (see which foreign bank accounts must be declared in France?). When these obligations have not been met, the law provides in particular for:

  • a fine of €1,500 per undeclared account and per year, increased to €10,000 for an account located in a State or territory that has not concluded with France an agreement giving access to banking information;
  • the tax evaded, with late-payment interest (0.20% per month) and, depending on the case, an 80% surcharge (Article 1729-0 A of the CGI), which then replaces the fine without being lower than it;
  • a reassessment period for income tax extended to ten years, unless the total balance of the accounts abroad did not exceed €50,000 at any time during the year;
  • in the most serious cases, criminal prosecution for tax fraud: when the fraud was committed by means of accounts opened abroad, the fine may reach €3 million, or double the proceeds of the offence, and the prison sentence seven years (Article 1741 of the CGI).

A voluntary regularisation does not, in principle, remove fines and surcharges, but it may make it possible to limit some of them: late-payment interest may thus, under certain conditions, be reduced by 50% when an amended return is filed voluntarily. Since the law of 23 October 2018, the tax authorities are moreover, in principle, required to report to the public prosecutor cases in which the tax reassessed exceeds €100,000 and carries certain surcharges. Before taking any step, it is advisable to consult a lawyer in order to analyse the situation and determine the most appropriate actions: see the articles regularising an undeclared foreign account: what to do if you forgot to declare it? and what fines apply for failing to declare an account abroad?, as well as the page on regularising an undeclared foreign account.

What I see in my cases

In my cases, undeclared accounts are almost always discovered by this route: the tax authorities receive the information, then send a letter to the taxpayer. These exchanges are what has changed most in recent years: information arrives from all over the world, and the tax authorities make full use of it. The accounts concerned are mainly securities accounts, life insurance policies and retirement accounts, located in all the countries of the European Union, in the United Kingdom, the United States, Israel, China, Hong Kong, Singapore and, increasingly, in Argentina and Canada.

FAQ

Is an account with a small balance reported?

In principle yes: for accounts of individuals, the standard provides for no threshold. An almost empty account may therefore be reported, and it is in principle to be declared every year on form no. 3916-3916-bis (see the guide form 3916: how to declare a foreign account, step by step).

Are accounts held in Switzerland concerned?

In principle yes: Switzerland has exchanged information with France under the Common Reporting Standard since 2018, for accounts held in 2017.

Are accounts held in the United States concerned?

The United States does not apply the Common Reporting Standard, but France receives certain information on its residents’ accounts under the agreement concluded with the United States in 2013, without account balances. The obligation to declare these accounts in France does not, in principle, depend on whether information is exchanged.

Are crypto-assets concerned?

The Common Reporting Standard covers financial accounts. For crypto-assets, a comparable mechanism has been adopted: in the European Union, Directive (EU) 2023/2226, known as “DAC 8”, has applied since 1 January 2026, and the first exchanges are planned for 2027. See the article crypto taxation: DAC 8 and the Travel Rule.

What happens when the tax authorities question a taxpayer about an account abroad?

They generally send a request for information (letter no. 751-SD) or, depending on the case, a request for justification of the origin of the assets (Article L23 C of the French Tax Procedure Code), which is in principle answered within sixty days. The answer, as a general rule, commits the taxpayer for the rest of the procedure: it is advisable to consult a lawyer before answering, in order to analyse the situation. See also the article on myPOS and the automatic exchange of foreign accounts.

Read more

Need Help?

CONTACT THE FIRM

Client Reviews

Google reviews, in their original language

J'ai sollicité les services de Maître Uzan dans le cadre d'un retour en France après une expatriation de plusieurs années au UK puis en Thailande. Mon dossier a été traité de manière très professionnelle avec des réponses claires et structurées, je referai appel aux services de Maître Uzan et recommande ses services.

Google reviewNovember 2026

Exceptionally clear and informative, and generously so. A pleasure to work with.

Google reviewOctober 2026

Navigating cross-border rules can be daunting. I quickly realized that I needed a truly knowledgeable and dedicated cross-border lawyer for my U.S trust to be inherited by my sibling in France.
Moreover, I really couldn't see myself handling French Tax Authorities on my own...
I located Maître Marc Uzan whose website is very detailed and most informative. It shows his knowledge and commitment, as well as his organization skills.
We then scheduled a one-hour telephone consultation which was very useful, pleasant, not hurried at all.
I am now a client of his, and happy to share this message with whomever may read it.

Google reviewOctober 2026

Invaluable and calming advice with a clear strategy for a UK inheritance in France. Arrived exceedingly stressed in the midst of an avalanche of workload as a UK estate executor. Marc has made the French side seem approachable when it all threatened too much. Don’t hesitate to invest in a consultation as it will be worth it.

Google reviewOctober 2026

J'ai contacté Maître Uzan car je me suis récemment posé des questions concernant ma situation fiscale. Il m'a rapidement proposé une consultation en visio. Il m'a apporté des explications claires sur ma situation, m'a guidé dans les démarches à effectuer pour compléter et corriger ma déclaration. Il m'a également rassuré sur ma situation. Je recommande.

Google reviewOctober 2026

Maître Uzan responded to my initial call very quickly. A video appointment was arranged promptly, and within days he had understood my complex cross-border situation and had started sorting it out. He listened carefully, was patient throughout, and achieved an excellent result. I recommend him highly.

Google reviewOctober 2026

Je ne peux que recommander les services de Maître Uzan. Résident fiscal de plusieurs pays (France et Royaume-Uni) et ayant une situation professionnelle inhabituelle, j'ai fait appel à Maître Uzan il y a plus de 2 ans pour m'aider à naviguer la complexité des conventions fiscales bilatérales (et je continue à faire appel à lui). Maître Uzan est expert dans son domaine - il s'est montré réactif, disponible et toujours de bon conseil.

Google reviewOctober 2026

J'ai fait appel à Maître Uzan dans le cadre d'une procédure fiscale longue et techniquement complexe. Analyse rigoureuse du dossier, réponses précises dans des délais parfois très courts, et surtout une vraie capacité à maintenir un dialogue constructif avec l'administration plutôt qu'à durcir inutilement les positions.
Il a pris le temps de m'expliquer chaque étape et les options possibles, sans jargon et sans promesses excessives. Le dossier s'est conclu par une issue négociée.
Un accompagnement sérieux, du premier échange jusqu'au suivi complet de l'exécution. Je recommande sans réserve.

Google reviewOctober 2026

Grand professionnalisme - Une expertise précieuse
Nous recommandons chaleureusement Maître Marc Uzan. Après une première mauvaise expérience avec un autre cabinet qui nous demandait des honoraires exorbitants sans même connaître notre dossier, trouver Maître Marc Uzan a été un vrai soulagement.
L'approche est totalement différente, premier entretien téléphonique professionnel suivi d'un rendez-vous dans son cabinet et d'échanges de mails très fluides.
Ses précieux conseils et sa réactivité nous permettent d'avancer sereinement sur le dossier de succession des parents anglais de mon mari (biens en Angleterre).
Il nous guide parfaitement pour cette première étape et nous poursuivrons avec lui en toute confiance dans les mois à venir pour nos déclarations en France.

Google reviewOctober 2026

J’ai été très satisfait de l’accompagnement de Maître Uzan. J’ai particulièrement apprécié la qualité de ses conseils, toujours clairs, précis et pragmatiques, ainsi que sa grande disponibilité et sa réactivité. Il prend le temps de bien comprendre les situations et d’expliquer clairement les différentes options et leurs implications. Un accompagnement très professionnel et de grande qualité. Je le recommande sans hésitation.

Google reviewOctober 2026

A great professional. He inspired a lot of confidence, and the fact that he speaks English was a huge help. Definitely highly recommended for expats.

Google reviewOctober 2026

Excellent accompagnement de Maître Uzan. Très professionnel, disponible et clair dans ses conseils, notamment pour ma première déclaration fiscale en France après de nombreuses années à l'étranger. Dossier parfaitement suivi. Je recommande vivement.

Google reviewAugust 2026

Très satisfait de l'accompagnement de cet avocat fiscaliste pour la régularisation de mes comptes à l'étranger. Professionnel, compétent et à l'écoute, il a su m'expliquer clairement les démarches et m'accompagner avec sérieux tout au long du processus. Je recommande vivement ses services!

Google reviewAugust 2026

Je suis venu consulter Maître Uzan pour une question fiscale en apparence assez simple, mais qui me préoccupait depuis un certain temps. Il m'a apporté une réponse claire, précise et rassurante. Je recommande vivement cette consultation à toute personne ayant des interrogations fiscales: plutôt que de chercher pendant des heures sur Internet, il est beaucoup plus utile de consulter un professionnel. On obtient une réponse adaptée à sa situation, ce que internet ou l'IA ne peuvent pas fournir.

Google reviewJuly 2026

Je souhaite partager mon expérience avec Maître Uzan, que j'ai découvert en ligne sans recommandation préalable. La clarté de son site et la présentation de son expertise m'ont immédiatement inspiré confiance. Dès notre premier échange, j'ai été rassurée par son professionnalisme, sa qualité d'écoute et sa maîtrise des enjeux. Je lui ai donc confié un dossier complexe lié à des comptes à l'étranger. En l'espace de deux mois, la situation a été entièrement régularisée. Maître Uzan a su en assurer l'analyse, piloter l'ensemble des démarches, prendre en charge les formalités nécessaires et conduire les échanges ainsi que les négociations avec l'administration fiscale avec rigueur et efficacité, aboutissant à un résultat très satisfaisant. Dans la continuité, il est également intervenu sur ma déclaration fiscale 2025, traitée dans des délais particulièrement rapides, avec la même exigence. Réactif, disponible et précis, les échanges ont toujours été fluides et constructifs (par téléphone et mails).

Google reviewApril 2026

Deux expériences très bonnes avec Maître Marc Uzan. Compétent, disponible et efficace. Tout a pu être réglé à distance dans deux affaires personnelles concernant le droit international (France -Allemagne). Visios, mails: échange courtois et précis. On a avancé très rapidement. Je recommande chaleureusement.

Google reviewJanuary 2026

Excellent conseil, particulièrement réactif et très pédagogue. Je ne peux que recommander chaudement!

Google reviewDecember 2025

J'ai eu la chance d'être accompagnée par Maître Uzan dans le cadre d'une succession internationale entre la France et les États-Unis, et je ne peux que le remercier chaleureusement pour son aide précieuse. Dans une période déjà émotionnellement difficile, il a su faire preuve d'une grande écoute, d'empathie et d'un professionnalisme irréprochable. Il a rendu compréhensibles des démarches fiscales complexes, en tenant compte à la fois des enjeux familiaux et des spécificités des deux systèmes (français et américain). Grâce à lui, tout s'est déroulé de manière fluide et sereine. Un avocat humain, compétent et engagé – je le recommande de tout cœur.

Google reviewOctober 2025

Il y a un an nous recevions un courrier du fisc sur des comptes étrangers. Après de nombreux échanges où nous avons donné au fisc tout ce qu'il demandait et montré notre bonne foi, rien n'y a fait. Il a fallu prendre un avocat et là comme par magie les choses ont été différentes...Il est bien dommage de devoir en arriver là pour faire valoir ses droits. En tout cas nous remercions Me Uzan pour son accompagnement et pour avoir trouvé un terrain d'entente avec le fisc, nous sommes soulagés que tout ca se termine.

Google reviewJuly 2024

Monsieur UZAN est un expert dans le domaine de la fiscalité, il maîtrise son sujet. Sa connaissance et son professionnalisme sont rares dans ce domaine. Merci.

Google reviewOctober 2024

J'ai bénéficié de conseils pertinents et précis au niveau de la fiscalité de mes activités; questions à propos desquelles je n'avais par ailleurs jamais trouvé de réponse. Je commençais à m'inquiéter car les enjeux étaient importants et il fallait que la situation s'apaise en se clarifiant. Tout est devenu limpide et je peux à présent avancer sereinement. Je recommande Me Uzan pour son professionnalisme et sa courtoisie.

Google reviewFebruary 2024

Nous avons eu la mauvaise surprise de recevoir une "proposition de rectification" (contrôle fiscal) en fin d'année. Après avoir essayé de discuter avec le contrôleur j'ai vite compris qu'il était indispensable de se faire accompagner par un avocat car il n'est malheureusement pas possible d'échanger de manière constructive en cas de contrôle. L'erreur était flagrante et Me Uzan a réussi à donner les bons arguments. Résultats: quasiment tout a été annulé. J'ai aussi fait appel à son expertise pour notre retour en France et il a été de très bons conseils.

Google reviewFebruary 2023

La contrôleuse ne voulait pas entendre nos explications depuis plus d'un an et grâce à Maître Uzan le dossier a pu être clôturé rapidement.

Google reviewDecember 2023

Maître Uzan a su apporter des réponses claires et rapides à mes questions. Sa réactivité et ses explications m'ont permis d'avancer sereinement dans mes affaires. Je le recommande vivement!

Google reviewSeptember 2021

M. Uzan nous a accompagné durant près d'un an dans notre dossier de compte étranger. Il a été disponible et son expertise dans ce domaine nous a permis de traverser cette épreuve très stressante.

Google reviewDecember 2021

See all reviews on Google →

CONTACT

Contact the firm

Appointments in French or English, at the office (Paris, 9th arrondissement) or by video call.

Maître Marc Uzan, tax lawyer in Paris

Marc Uzan, Tax Lawyer

Maître Marc Uzan has been a Tax Lawyer at the Paris Bar since 2008 and has practised in taxation since 2005.

He meets his clients and works in French as well as in English; he is on the list of English-speaking attorneys of the US Embassy in Paris.

He holds a Master’s degree in Taxation from Université Paris XII, is a graduate of ESSEC, and holds the DSCG (French higher diploma in accounting and management).

Before founding his own law firm, he worked in major international law firms.

He advises individuals and companies on international inheritance, international taxation, tax audits, foreign accounts, returning to France (impatriate regime), tax litigation, negotiation with the tax authorities, appeals before the courts, RSUs, stock options and free share awards, foreign real estate, foreign income, tax returns, local taxes and tax planning.

He has handled more than 300 tax audits, more than 250 foreign account procedures, and more than 200 appeals before the tax courts.

About the firm →